Moreover, all these factors could lead to poor quality of writing, resulting in higher rejection rates from established, peer-reviewed journals. Other reasons could include inadequate data analysis support, lack of awareness of current reporting guidelines and publication practices, or even inadequate technical writing expertise. Even for those studies whose results are published, negative findings and adverse events were less completely reported in publications as compared in database.Īlthough most clinicians and academic scientists understand the need to publish their work, majority of them cite lack of time to write or submit as the main reason for not attempting to publish. This means that findings of half the research are not communicated to the scientific world, which is a great loss to the society and is unfair to the patients participating in these studies. In an analysis of 600 randomly selected clinical trials listed on for which results were posted on the database, only 50% were found published in a journal. Still, only part of the research done gets published. Today, considering both electronic and print media and open access publishing, the array of biomedical journals and publications has increased exponentially. Clinicians and academic scientists must realize the importance of publishing their research which is not only an ethical and a moral obligation but also a due culmination of the research process. Publishing biomedical research is especially important because it helps enhance understanding of health, diseases, and their management and improves medical practice, benefiting the entire human society. Publishing research benefits science, its application to practice, and helps other researchers design their own experiments. The research cycle is not complete without communicating its findings to the scientific fraternity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |